Skip to content

Gaza has no DNA lab — and more than 8,000 families are waiting on names

The Palestinian Health Ministry counts over 8,000 people missing beneath rubble. The ICRC says identification needs biological samples, reference databases and matching capacity Gaza does not have.

By 4 min read
0

The arithmetic of the missing in Gaza has outgrown every tool available to resolve it. More than 8,000 people are missing beneath rubble by the Palestinian Health Ministry’s August 2026 count — and the territory has no DNA-testing facility with which to give remains back their names, Ahram Online reported on Monday, citing the International Committee of the Red Cross.

The ICRC framing is clinical because the problem is: “DNA-led identification requires biological samples from unidentified remains and reference samples from relatives, alongside protected databases capable of reliably matching them.” None of that infrastructure exists in Gaza, and forensic capacity more broadly is described as severely limited. The Gaza Health Ministry and Kathryne Bomberger, Director-General of the International Commission on Missing Persons, have previously said Israel restricted DNA-testing supplies from entering the territory.

What identification looks like without a lab

In the absence of forensics, families identify the dead the way it was done a century ago: photographs, clothing, scars, birthmarks, dental features. The method’s limits are documented. During the body returns of November 2025, only 99 of 345 transferred bodies had been identified by 26 November. Each unidentified body is an open case in a family: the article names Mohammed Al-Najjar, 23, missing since December 2023; Israa Al-Khaldi, a 28-year-old lawyer who disappeared in 2024; and Walaa, 24, whose mother Itidal Al-Firri still searches.

The numbers layer across agencies and years: roughly 3,600 family reports of unknown fate filed with Gaza’s Health Ministry by October 2025, and at least 7,000 unresolved cases with the ICRC at that date — a figure that excludes remains still buried. The October 2025 ceasefire halted major fighting but not the dying: more than 1,300 Palestinians have been killed since it took effect.

Why this is an Egyptian story too

Egypt sits closer to this file than any state except the parties themselves — as mediator in the ceasefire architecture, as the gatekeeper of Rafah for humanitarian flows, and as the neighbour whose hospitals have received Gaza’s wounded. The identification crisis is also a reconstruction question: rubble cannot be cleared at scale while it is a mass grave, and Egypt has positioned itself at the centre of Gaza reconstruction planning.

A DNA lab is, by the standards of this war, a small ask — equipment, reagents, trained staff, database access. The ICRC’s point in publishing the gap is that identification is not sentimentality; it is a legal and humanitarian obligation, and at present there is no pathway to meeting it.

What a functioning identification system would require

The components are known, because other post-conflict settings have assembled them. First, mortuary and forensic capacity to recover and document remains as rubble is cleared — the stage at which evidence is preserved or lost forever. Second, systematic collection of reference samples from relatives, which is why the International Commission on Missing Persons — the body Kathryne Bomberger leads, built originally on the identification effort after the Bosnian war — figures in this story: its methods turned DNA matching at scale from a research technique into a humanitarian discipline. Third, the protected databases the ICRC describes, with governance that families can trust across political lines.

None of this can be improvised after the fact. Every month of clearance without forensic protocols converts identifiable remains into anonymous ones, and every anonymous burial converts a case that could have closed into one that never will. That is the quiet urgency inside the ICRC’s clinical language: the window in which Gaza’s missing can still become Gaza’s identified is the same window in which reconstruction begins.

For the families in the article — the Al-Najjars, the Al-Khaldis, Itidal Al-Firri still searching for Walaa — the legal category “missing” is its own limbo: no death certificate, no inheritance, no grave, no end. Eight thousand such limbos, by the Health Ministry’s count, are now part of what any Gaza settlement will have to resolve.

Frequently asked questions

How many people are missing in Gaza?

More than 8,000 beneath rubble per the Palestinian Health Ministry (August 2026); the ICRC counted at least 7,000 unresolved cases as of October 2025, excluding buried remains.

Why can’t remains be identified?

Gaza has no DNA-testing facility and severely limited forensic capacity. DNA identification requires sampling, family reference samples and protected matching databases — none available locally.

How do families identify the dead now?

By photographs, clothing, scars, birthmarks and dental features. In the November 2025 body returns, only 99 of 345 bodies had been identified within the month.

What restricted DNA capacity in the first place?

The Gaza Health Ministry and ICMP Director-General Kathryne Bomberger have previously said Israel restricted DNA-testing supplies from entering Gaza, and the territory’s forensic infrastructure has been degraded through the war — leaving no laboratory able to run identification at the scale the caseload requires.

How did this story make you feel?

Share this story

Follow Us

Written by

Omar El-Shazly

Covers national news across Egypt — government decisions, public policy, the institutions that run the country, and the stories shaping daily life from Cairo out to the governorates. The beat spans announcements from ministries and parliament through to how a policy actually lands in Minya or Port Said. Reporting starts from the primary document wherever one exists: the decree, the budget line, the official statement. Where a claim cannot be sourced, it is not published, and where two official figures disagree, the story says so rather than choosing the tidier number.